Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign.

INTRODUCTION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was developed to improve outcomes for all patients with sepsis. Despite sepsis being the primary cause of death after thermal injury, burns have always been excluded from the Surviving Sepsis efforts. To improve sepsis outcomes in burn patients, an international group of burn experts developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign (SSABC) as a testable guideline to improve burn sepsis outcomes. METHODS: The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported. RESULTS: The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis. CONCLUSION: Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.

Infections in Burn Patients.

Infections are the leading cause of mortality in burn patients who survive their initial resuscitation. Burn injury leads to immunosuppression and a dysregulated inflammatory response which can have a prolonged impact. Early surgical excision along with support of the multidisciplinary burn team has improved mortality in burn patients. The authors review diagnostic and therapeutic challenges as well as strategies for management of burn related infections.

Suicide by self-inflicted burns - A persistent psychiatric problem.

Self-inflicted burns are a relatively uncommon but profound attempt at suicide. Twenty years ago, we first reviewed our experience with self-inflicted burns. With this current study, we sought to determine whether there had been any change in the incidence or outcomes of self-inflicted burns. All burn patients admitted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021, with self-inflicted burns were compared with all other admissions. The frequency of self-inflicted burns and confounding risk factors of patients with self-inflicted burns remained unchanged. A large proportion (87.4 %) of the patients had psychiatric disease. They also had larger burns and higher mortality than accidental burns. Unexpectedly, logistic regression analysis that controlled for age, total percent total body surface area (TBSA) burn, sex, and inhalation injury revealed that those patients with self-inflicted burns had 72 % lower odds of dying than the general population. In conclusion, there has been no improvement in the incidence of self-inflicted burns. They result in very severe injuries, but when age, burn size, gender, and inhalation injury are controlled for, they have at least as good a chance for survival as the general burn population.

Understanding Factors in Burn Patient Follow-up.

Follow-up rates are concerningly low among burn-injured patients. This study investigates the factors associated with low follow-up rates and missed appointments. We hypothesize that patients who are homeless, use illicit substances, and have psychiatric comorbidities will have lower rates of follow-up and more missed appointments. Data from a discharge-planning survey of 281 burn-injured patients discharged from September 2019 to July 2020 were analyzed and matched with patients' electronic medical records for a retrospective chart review. Data collected included general demographics, burn characteristics, hospitalization details, follow-up visits, missed appointments, homeless status, substance use, major psychiatric illness, and survey responses. Data analysis used chi-square, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and multivariate regression analysis. Overall, 37% of patients had no follow-up in clinic and 46% had one or more missed appointment. On multivariate regression analysis, homeless patients were more likely to never follow-up, odds ratio (OR) = 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11-0.49), as were patients who anticipated experiencing transportation difficulties, OR = 0.28 (95% CI = 0.15-0.50). Homeless patients were more likely to have missed appointments, OR = 0.23 (95% CI = 0.1-0.54). On univariate analysis, patients with one or more documented major psychiatric illness had lower follow-up rates, with 50.62% having no follow-up (P < .01). Among patients who responded to the survey that they were current drug users, 52% had no follow-up as compared to 28% of patients who responded that they did not use drugs (P < .01).

Burn Resuscitation Practices in North America: Results of the Acute Burn ResUscitation Multicenter Prospective Trial (ABRUPT).

OBJECTIVES: ABRUPT was a prospective, noninterventional, observational study of resuscitation practices at 21 burn centers. The primary goal was to examine burn resuscitation with albumin or crystalloids alone, to design a future prospective randomized trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: No modern prospective study has determined whether to use colloids or crystalloids for acute burn resuscitation. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with burns ≥ 20% total body surface area (TBSA) had hourly documentation of resuscitation parameters for 48 hours. Patients received either crystalloids alone or had albumin supplemented to crystalloid based on center protocols. RESULTS: Of 379 enrollees, two-thirds (253) were resuscitated with albumin and one-third (126) were resuscitated with crystalloid alone. Albumin patients received more total fluid than Crystalloid patients (5.2 ± 2.3 vs 3.7 ± 1.7 mL/kg/% TBSA burn/24 hours), but patients in the Albumin Group were older, had larger burns, higher admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and more inhalation injury. Albumin lowered the in-to-out (I/O) ratio and was started ≤12 hours in patients with the highest initial fluid requirements, given >12 hours with intermediate requirements, and avoided in patients who responded to crystalloid alone. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin use is associated with older age, larger and deeper burns, and more severe organ dysfunction at presentation. Albumin supplementation is started when initial crystalloid rates are above expected targets and improves the I/O ratio. The fluid received in the first 24 hours was at or above the Parkland Formula estimate.

Modified Frailty Index is an Independent Predictor of Death in the Burn Population: A Secondary Analysis of the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE) Study.

Frailty can increase the risk of dying after suffering a severe injury. The Modified Frailty Index (MFI) was developed by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to determine the impact of frailty on outcomes. Our aim was to correlate frailty with survival following a burn injury using the 11-item and 5-item MFI. We performed a secondary analysis of the Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation (TRIBE) study. Data including, age, gender, medical history, extent and severity of burn injury, inhalation injury and discharge disposition was collected from the TRIBE database. The 11-item MFI (MFI-11) and 5-item MFI (MFI-5) scores were calculated for all patients in the TRIBE database. The TRIBE database included 347 patients. The mean age of subjects was 43 ± 17 years. Mean total body surface area burn (TBSA) was 38 ± 18%, and 23% had inhalation injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that both MFI-5 (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.11-3.11; P-value .02) and MFI-11 (OR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.18-2.8; P-value .007) were independent predictors for mortality. Additionally, MFI-11 scores that are >1 were independently associated with a markedly increased risk of dying after a burn injury (OR 2.91; 95% CI: 1.1-7.7; P-value .03). The MFI can be used to identify vulnerable burn injured patients who are at high risk of dying.

BACTERIAL PATHOGEN-ASSOCIATED MOLECULAR PATTERNS UPREGULATE HUMAN GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR EXPRESSION IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS.

ABSTRACT: It is well known that bacterial components (pathogen-associated molecular patterns [PAMPs]) induce a proinflammatory response through pattern recognition receptor signaling. What is not known, however, is how the inflammatory response is downregulated. We hypothesize that bacterial products initiate compensatory anti-inflammatory responses by inducing expression of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from leukocytes concentrated from single human donors (Leukopaks). PBMCs were treated with a gram-negative bacterial component, LPS, or gram-positive bacterial components, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) or peptidoglycan (PGN), for 1, 3, or 13 h. Protein expression of hGR was evaluated by Western blot analysis. RNA was extracted from similarly treated cells for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of hGR and cytokine expression. At 13 h after LPS treatment, there was an increase in the reference hGR protein (hGRα) expressed within some but not all PBMCs isolated from Leukopaks. There was also a dose-dependent increase in hGRα expression with increasing concentrations of PGN (10 and 50 µg/mL). LTA, however, did not affect hGRα expression. PGN also increased the mRNA expression of an hGR splice variant, hGR-B(54). The mRNA expression changes for the inflammatory cytokines were Leukopak specific. We found that cell wall components of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria can increase the expression of hGRα. Although these PAMPs augment the inflammatory response, it seems that there is a simultaneous upregulation of hGRα expression. Because binding of cortisol to hGRα typically induces anti-inflammatory proteins, the same PAMPs that induce an inflammatory response seem to also initiate a negative feedback system by inducing hGRα expression in PBMCs.

A Novel Human Glucocorticoid Receptor Variant, G459V, is Hyperactive in Response to Steroids.

ABSTRACT: A potential cause of the variable response to injury and sepsis is the variability of a patient's human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) profile. To identify hGR variants, blood samples were collected on admission and biweekly thereafter from hospitalized patients who sustained at least a 20% total body surface area burn injury. A hyperactive G1376T single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) isoform was identified. This SNP led to a single amino acid change of glutamine to valine at site 459, "G459V," in the DNA-binding domain. The isoform's activity was tested in a reporter assay after treatment with steroids, the hGR antagonist RU486 (mifepristone) alone, or RU486 followed by steroids. When treated with hydrocortisone, the hGR G459V isoform had a hyperactive response; its activity was over 30 times greater than the reference hGRα. Unexpectedly, G459V had significantly increased activity when treated with the hGR antagonist RU486. With the combination of both RU486 and hydrocortisone, G459V activity was repressed, but greater than that of RU486 alone. Finally, when hGRα was cotransfected with G459V to simulate isoform interaction, the activity was closer to that of the hGRα profile than the G459V isoform. The unique activity of the G459V isoform shows that some variants of hGR have the potential to alter a person's response to stress and steroid treatment and may be a factor as to why mitigating the clinical response to sepsis and other stressors has been so elusive.

Wildfire Burn Patients: A Unique Population.

In the past ten years wildfires have burned an average of 6.8 million acres per year and this is expected to increase with climate change. Wildfire burn patient outcomes have not been previously well characterized. Wildfire burn patients from the Tubbs or Camp wildfires and non-wildfire burn matched controls were identified from the burn center database and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, readmission and development of wound infections. Time of presentation and operating room use after wildfires was evaluated. Sixteen wildfire burn patients were identified and matched with 32 controls. Wildfire burn patients trended towards higher mortality (19% wildfire vs. 9% non-wildfire, p=0.386), longer LOS (18 days wildfire vs. 15 days non-wildfire, p=0.406), longer ICU LOS (17 days wildfire vs. 11 days non-wildfire, p=0.991), increased readmission (19% wildfire vs. 3% non-wildfire, p=0.080) and higher rates of wound infection (31% wildfire vs. 19% non-wildfire, p=0.468). The majority of wildfire patients (88%) presented within 24 hours of the wildfire reaching a residential area. Operating room time within the first week was 13 hours 44 minutes for the Tubbs Fire and 19 hours 1 minute for the Camp Fire. Patients who sustain burns in wildfires are potentially at increased risk of mortality, prolonged LOS, wound infection and readmission.

Face Burns: A 4-Year Experience.

Burns on the face pose unique management challenges because they are in a place that is constantly visible, so scars are hard to hide. The goal of this study was to review our experience of adult patients who had face burns. We performed a retrospective review of adult patients (≥18 years old) who were admitted to a regional burn center from July 2015 to June 2019 with face burns. Sex, age, ethnicity, burn etiology, burn size, and discharge status were collected from electronic medical records of the patients who met study criteria. Descriptive statistics, Student's t-tests, and chi-square tests were performed in Stata/SE 16.1. Significance was defined as a P-value < .05. In 4 years, 595/1705 patients (~35% of admissions) were admitted with face burns. The mean age was 44.9 ± 17.0 (mean ± SD) years, with the majority being men (475, 80%). The mean burn size was 19.8 ± 20.9% TBSA with 10.1 ± 19.8% TBSA being third degree. The mean head burn size for any face burn was 2.8 ± 1.8% TBSA. The majority of burns were due to flames (478, 80%) and of those 122 (21%) were from accelerant use and 43 (7%) resulted from propane or butane use. Scalds caused 53 (9%), electric 25 (4%), hot tar 5 (1%), and chemical 5 (1%). Overall, 208 (35%) patients had grafting of some portion of their body, but only 31 patients (5.2%) had face grafting. The mean age of those with face grafting compared with patients who did not need grafting was 45.9 ± 13.8 and 44.9 ± 17.2 years, respectively. Patients who needed grafting had a mean third-degree burn size of 31.7 ± 25.4% TBSA and a mean head (including face) burn size of 4.7 ± 2.0% TBSA, whereas patients who did not need grafting had a mean third-degree burn size of 8.9 ± 18.7% TBSA and a mean head burn size of 2.7 ± 1.8% head TBSA. Patients requiring face grafts had longer lengths of stay, intensive unit stays, ventilator days, and mortality than those whose face burns healed spontaneously. Overall, head burns in adults were common within the 4-year time span we studied, but only a small fraction (5%) had face grafts. The patients who needed grafting for their head burns had significantly larger total body and face burns and had a 2.4-fold higher mortality rate compared to patients who did not need grafting. Most face burns were caused by flame, especially the use of accelerants or flammable gases. Prevention efforts should focus on avoiding the use of accelerants and being careful with flammable gases.

Follow-up After Burn Injury Is Disturbingly Low and Linked With Social Factors.

For medical and social reasons, it is important that burn patients attend follow-up appointments (FUAs). Our goal was to examine the factors leading to missed FUAs in burn patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients admitted to the burn center from 2016 to 2018. Data collected included burn characteristics, social history, and zip code. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests, and multivariate regression models. A total of 878 patients were analyzed, with 224 (25.5%) failing to attend any FUAs and 492 (56.0%) missing at least one appointment (MA). Patients who did not attend any FUAs had smaller burns (4.5 [8]% vs 6.5 [11]% median [inter quartile range]), traveled farther (70.2 [111.8] vs 52.5 [76.7] miles), and were more likely to be homeless (22.8% vs 6.9%) and have drug dependence (47.3% vs 27.2%). Patients who had at least one MA were younger (42 [26] vs 46 [28] years) and more likely to be homeless (17.5% vs 2.6%) and have drug dependence (42.5% vs 19.4%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with never attending an FUA were distance from hospital (odds ratio [OR] 1.004), burn size (OR 0.96), and homelessness (OR 0.33). Factors associated with missing at least one FUA: age (OR 0.99), drug dependence (OR 0.46), homelessness (OR 0.22), and Emergency Department visits (OR 0.56). A high percentage of patients fail to make any appointment following their injury and/or have at least one MA. Both FUAs and MAs are influenced by social determinants of health.

Longitudinal profiling of the burn patient cutaneous and gastrointestinal microbiota: a pilot study.

Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients that have sustained a severe burn injury. Early detection and treatment of infections improves outcomes and understanding changes in the host microbiome following injury and during treatment may aid in burn care. The loss of functional barriers, systemic inflammation, and commensal community perturbations all contribute to a burn patient's increased risk of infection. We sampled 10 burn patients to evaluate cutaneous microbial populations on the burn wound and corresponding spared skin on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-intensive care unit admission. In addition, skin samples were paired with perianal and rectal locations to evaluate changes in the burn patient gut microbiome following injury and treatment. We found significant (P = 0.011) reduction in alpha diversity on the burn wound compared to spared skin throughout the sampling period as well as reduction in common skin commensal bacteria such as Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermitis. Compared to healthy volunteers (n = 18), the burn patient spared skin also exhibited a significant reduction in alpha diversity (P = 0.001). Treatments such as systemic or topical antibiotic administration, skin grafting, and nutritional formulations also impact diversity and community composition at the sampling locations. When evaluating each subject individually, an increase in relative abundance of taxa isolated clinically by bacterial culture could be seen in 5/9 infections detected among the burn patient cohort.

Management of facial burns.

Burns to the face affect a part of the body that cannot be hidden and thus exposes potentially major changes in appearance to society. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the caregiver to optimize healing and minimize scarring. The goal for partial-thickness burns is to have them heal within 2-3 weeks to minimize healing time. For full-thickness burns there needs to be strategies to optimize the outcomes for skin grafting and minimize scarring. The goal of this review is to discuss the best way to improve the outcomes of these devastating injuries.

Contact Hand Burns in Children: Still a Major Prevention Need.

Since toddlers explore with their hands, contact burns continue to be a major pediatric problem. The purpose of this report is to review our 8-year experience with contact burns of the hand. After institutional review board approval, a review of pediatric contact hand burns that occurred between 2006 and 2014 was performed. In the 8-year span, 536 children had contact hand burns. The majority suffered burns from an oven or stove (120). The other etiologies included burns from a fireplace (76), clothing iron (65), curling or straightening iron (50), and firepit or campfire (46). The mean age was 2.62 years, with a range of 2 months to 18 years. Male children (339) burned their hands more than females (197). Most children burned the palmar aspect of their hand (384) compared to the dorsum (61). These burns typically cover small TBSAs (mean 1.08% TBSA), with only 2% of burns comprising >5% TBSA. Approximately, 84% of these patients did not need surgery, but 86 (16%) had skin grafting (usually full thickness) and roughly 26% of those needed reconstructive surgery. Contact burns to the hand continue to be a major problem for toddlers. Children are most likely to burn themselves on an oven or stove, fireplace, clothing iron or curling/straightening iron. The palmar surface of the hand is the most likely site. While most children do not require surgery, approximately 16% require grafting. A significant number of those patients need reconstructive surgery. Clearly, current prevention efforts have failed to reduce these injuries.

Examining 1:1 vs. 4:1 Packed Red Blood Cell to Fresh Frozen Plasma Ratio Transfusion During Pediatric Burn Excision.

Blood transfusions following major burn injury are common due to operative losses, blood sampling, and burn physiology. While massive transfusion improves outcomes in adult trauma patients, literature examining its effect in critically ill children is limited. The study purpose was to prospectively compare outcomes of major pediatric burns receiving a 1:1 vs. 4:1 packed red blood cell to fresh frozen plasma transfusion strategy during massive burn excision. Children with >20% total body surface area burns were randomized to a 1:1 or 4:1 packed red blood cell/fresh frozen plasma transfusion ratio during burn excision. Parameters examined include patient demographics, burn size, pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scores, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction scores, laboratory values, total blood products transfused, and the presence of blood stream infections or pneumonia. A total of 68 children who met inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups (n = 34). Mean age, PRISM scores, estimated blood loss (600 ml (400-1175 ml) vs. 600 ml (300-1150 ml), P = 0.68), ventilator days (5 vs. 9, P = 0.47), and length of stay (57 vs. 60 days, P = 0.24) had no difference. No differences in frequency of blood stream infection (20 vs. 18, P = 0.46) or pneumonia events (68 vs. 116, P = 0.08) were noted. On multivariate analysis, only total body surface area burn size, inhalation injury, and PRISM scores (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with infections.

Clinical and Socioeconomic Differences in Methamphetamine-Positive Burn Patients.

Previous research on burn patients who test positive for methamphetamines (meth) has yielded mixed results regarding whether meth-positive status leads to worse outcomes and longer hospitalizations. We hypothesized that meth-positive patients at our regional burn center would have worse outcomes. We reviewed burn admissions from January 2014 to December 2017 and compared total patients versus meth-positive, and matched meth-negative versus meth-positive for total BSA burn, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) days, days on ventilator, discharge status (lived/died), number of operating room (OR) visits, number of procedures, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and discharge disposition. Of 1363 total patients, 264 (19.4%) were meth-positive on toxicology screen. We matched 193 meth-positive patients with meth-negative controls based on TBSA burn, age, and inhalation injury. In the total population comparison, meth-positive patients had larger burns (15.6% vs 12.2%; P = .004), longer LOS (17.8 vs 14.3 days; P = .041), and fewer operations/TBSA (0.12 vs 0.2; P = .04), and lower socioeconomic status. Meth-positive patients were less likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and more likely to leave against medical advice. In the matched patients, we found no significant differences in LOS or OR visits/TBSA burn. Meth-positive patients have lower socioeconomic status, larger burns, and longer LOS compared to the total burn population. Methamphetamine use, by itself, does not appear to change outcomes. Methamphetamine use leads to larger burns in a population with fewer resources than the general population.